Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8610SC944PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

At the outset, we note that this appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to follow the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Marisco v. Adams, 47 N.C. App. 196, 266 S.E. 2d 696 (1980). Rule 9 requires that exceptions appear in the record in the manner provided for in Rule 10. Rule 10(b)(1) states that exceptions “shall be set out immediately following the record of judicial action to which it is addressed.” The purpose of the rule is to make appellate review more effective by narrowing the scope of inquiry to, and providing a visible reference point in the record for, the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API