Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
The question in this case concerns the proper tariff classification of leather made of India water buffalo calfskin. The leather — which was exported from Italy and entered at the port of Chicago in 1970 — was classified by the government under item 121.30 Of the tariff schedules as calf upper leather and assessed duty at the rate of 10% ad valorem.
Plaintiff contends that this classification is erroneous and claims that the importation is properly classifiable under item 121.57 as “not fancy” other leather, dutiable at the rate of 7%.
The pertinent provisions of the tariff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- S & T Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Ehrenreich Photo-Optical Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Hartog Foods International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.