Legal Opinion

Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 26, 1973No. C.D.4495; Court No. 71-8-00938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The question in this case concerns the proper tariff classification of leather made of India water buffalo calfskin. The leather — which was exported from Italy and entered at the port of Chicago in 1970 — was classified by the government under item 121.30 Of the tariff schedules as calf upper leather and assessed duty at the rate of 10% ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends that this classification is erroneous and claims that the importation is properly classifiable under item 121.57 as “not fancy” other leather, dutiable at the rate of 7%.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. S & T Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  3. Ehrenreich Photo-Optical Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  5. Hartog Foods International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API