Legal Opinion

Hartog Foods International Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 18, 1991No. Court No. 87-07-00789Published

1Opinion of the Court

Background

Musgrave, Judge:

Plaintiff Hartog Foods International (“Hartog”) imported apricot, peach and pear concentrate from 1984 until 1986. The merchandise was invoiced as “32 Brix”1 “apricot [or peach or pear] concentrate” or “apricot [or peach or pear] puree concentrate,” with or without other qualifying language. The products so imported shall be referred to collectively as “the concentrated fruits.” Customs classified the merchandise under the following Items in Schedule 1, Part 9 of the TSUS:

Subpart C. — Fruit Flours, Peels, Pastes, Pulps, Jellies, Jams, Marmalades and Butters

Fruit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API