Hartog Foods International Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Background
Musgrave, Judge:
Plaintiff Hartog Foods International (“Hartog”) imported apricot, peach and pear concentrate from 1984 until 1986. The merchandise was invoiced as “32 Brix”1 “apricot [or peach or pear] concentrate” or “apricot [or peach or pear] puree concentrate,” with or without other qualifying language. The products so imported shall be referred to collectively as “the concentrated fruits.” Customs classified the merchandise under the following Items in Schedule 1, Part 9 of the TSUS:
Subpart C. — Fruit Flours, Peels, Pastes, Pulps, Jellies, Jams, Marmalades and Butters
Fruit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.