Legal Opinion

Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 2, 1980No. C.D. 4835; Court No. 76-1-00138Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

Plaintiff in this action is seeking to recover a portion of the duties paid on certain finished leather imported from France. *2The merchandise was classified as calf or kip leather under item 121.30, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, which provides for duty at the rate of 9 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends the leather is not calf or kip and consequently is subject to classification under item 121.57, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, which provides for duty at 5 per centum ad valorem.

The pertinent statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Daniel Green Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. Robinson-Wagner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API