Legal Opinion

Akeroyd v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 13, 1928No. 2998PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The proper classification of various imports of so-called Colonial scoured wool is involved in this appeal. They were classified by the collector in each case, under paragraph 1102 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 31 cents per pound as scoured wool. The importers protested, claiming dutiability of the wools under the same paragraph at 31 cents per pound on the clean content, with an alternative claim under paragraph 1459 as unenumerated unmanufactured articles. The protests having been consolidated, the United States Customs Court overruled the same, and the importers appeal.

The issues here are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. Kwong Yuen ShingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. Maine Central Railroad v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Chicago Wool Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Excelsior Accordions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Moscahlades Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API