Legal Opinion

S & T Imports, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 18, 1977No. C.D. 4690; Court No. 72-12-02631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The importations involved in this action consist of merchandise invoiced as “Drained preserved pineapple” which wqs *46exported from Mexico and entered at the port of Laredo, Texas in September 1971. The merchandise was classified by the government as candied, crystallized, or glace fruits under item 154.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as modified by T.D. 68-9 and assessed duty at the rate of 10% ad valorem.1 Plaintiff challenges this classification and claims the imported merchandise is properly classifiable as prepared or preserved pineapple under item…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Merry Mary Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
  3. Terumo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API