People v. Chamness
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
The defendant,. charged with obtaining money under false pretenses, was found guilty and judgment entered imposing a fine of one hundred dollars or, in default of its payment, ninety days in jail. Defendant promptly paid the fine, then perfected his appeal. Contending that by this satisfaction of the judgment the' questions presented by the appeal became moot, the People move its dismissal.
So far as we are aware, the precise question thus submitted to us has not been considered by any of the appellate courts of this state. The rule is well established in civil actions, however, that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Piper v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re LincolnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- State v. Van TasselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Town of White Sulphur Springs v. VoiseMontana Supreme Court · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.