Legal Opinion
State v. Van Tassel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 13, 1971PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The defendant, Yan Tassel, appeals from an order made in a proceeding under ORS 426.070 through 426.170, adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Oregon State Hospital, Salem, on the ground that the judicial proceeding which resulted in this order did not follow the requirements of ORS 426.070 in so far as it requires:
“The judge * * * upon being notified in writing under oath by two persons * * * that any other person within the county is mentally ill and by reason of such illness is in need of treatment, care or custody, shall cause the allegedly mentally ill…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Godwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Bradshaw v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. B. (In Re J. B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.