Legal Opinion

In Re Lincoln

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1929No. Docket No. 5416PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The appeal herein is from a judgment suspending the accused attorney from membership in the legal fraternity for the period of one year, commencing December 24, 1924. The first question with which we are confronted is: Have the questions presented by the appeal become moot by the expiration of the period of suspension? (There is no doubt but that the suspension period has expired on account of the self-executing character of the judgment. See In re Graves, 62 Cal. App. 168 [216 Pac. 386], and Lincoln v. Superior Court, 95 Cal. App. 35 [271 Pac. 1107].)

The respondent Bar…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlecknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Page v. People ex rel. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State v. WinthropWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Javits v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. People v. ChamnessAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1930
  5. In Re BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API