Legal Opinion

Piper v. Hawley

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1918No. Sac. No. 2434PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Yolo County directing the issuance of a temporary mandatory injunction. W. A. Anderson, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order directing the issuance of a temporary mandatory injunction requiring the removal of a certain earth embankment and temporary sack levee from what is known as Knights Landing Ridge, in the county of Yolo. The facts out of which the controversy between the parties hereto arose are substantially as follows: The Sacramento River flows through the Sacramento Valley in a general northerly to southerly direction. During its course therein and from a point near its entry into the valley to its mouth it passes between banks raised above the level…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Sanguinetti v. PockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jones v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  4. Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kendall v. FoulksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API