Witt v. Garrod
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.
Coke Witt, and wife, appéal from a judgment of the district court of Caddo county, Okla., in favor of Harry G. Garrod and wife.
The plaintiffs, Garrod, filed suit for judgment on note and foreclosure of mortgage on farm land. Defendants, Witt, answered that the note and mortgage were given as purchase price of land conveyed by Garrods to Witts by warranty deed, without exceptions, and asserted an offset and counterclaim for damages for fraud and breach of contract and warranty because the land was cut in two by a railroad and was deficient in acreage. This language from the brief of Witts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ivester v. State Ex Rel. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Joiner v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Miller v. WissertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Creach v. Home Owners' Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Bone v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. OuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.