Legal Opinion

Miller v. Wissert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1913No. 2646PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from District Court,, Alfalfa County; James W. Steen, Judge. Action by Jacob Wissert against John P. Miller. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in. error, defendant below, to recover a certain sum as damages alleged to be due the plaintiff on account of false and fraudulent representations made to him by the defendant, concerning the number of acres contained in a certain tract • of land, purchased by the plaintiff from the defendant. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

The record, in so far as it is set out in the briefs of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Westerman v. CorderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hood v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Henry v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API