Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ivester v. State Ex Rel. Gillum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1938No. 28350PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action involves the constitutionality of Senate Bill 285 of the Sixteenth Legislature (eh. 66, art. 14, S. L. 1937; Okla. St. Ann. sec. 184 a, b, and c), which authorizes the board of county commissioners of each county “to hear and determine allegations of excessive assessments, mistakes or differences in the description of or value of lands or other property for the year 1936 and prior years, provided, the taxes have not been paid, upon the application of any taxpayer filed with the county clerk of said county on or before November 1, 1938.” The act provides for a hearing upon the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. City of Louisville v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Federal Express Corp. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Headley v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API