Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ouart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
HURST, C.J.
(specially concurring on rehearing). I agree that the appeal as to Hunter should be dismissed. I also agree that the judgment in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Ouart should be affirmed, but for reasons other than those stated in the majority opinion.
The arguments largely revolve around these questions: (1) Under the issues made by the pleadings and evidence, did the court have jurisdiction to award the Ouarts royalty in addition to the full % royalty awarded to the owners of the mineral interest in the southeast 10 acres on which the producing well is located? (2) Should the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kimbley v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- New State Oil & Gas Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Galt v. MetscherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.