Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Village of New London

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1988No. 87-707PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The instant appeal requires this court to determine whether a political subdivision, which holds land open to certain recreational use without charge, is immune from tort liability to a recreational user who is injured on such property. For the reasons expressed infra, we answer this question in the affirmative.

It is axiomatic that a motion for summary judgment may only be granted where there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Civ. R. 56(C). Moreover, summary judgment is inappropriate unless it appears from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Garofalo v. Chicago Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ryll v. Columbus Fireworks Display Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API