Johnson v. Village of New London
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The instant appeal requires this court to determine whether a political subdivision, which holds land open to certain recreational use without charge, is immune from tort liability to a recreational user who is injured on such property. For the reasons expressed infra, we answer this question in the affirmative.
It is axiomatic that a motion for summary judgment may only be granted where there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Civ. R. 56(C). Moreover, summary judgment is inappropriate unless it appears from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Garofalo v. Chicago Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Ryll v. Columbus Fireworks Display Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.