Legal Opinion

Needham v. the Provident Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1996No. 68630PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, William J. Needham and Lucy M. Needham (“appellants,” collectively, or “W. Needham” and “L. Needham,” individually), appeal from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, The Provident Bank, by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. Appellants submit that genuine issues of material fact remain for litigation regarding their lender liability claims against Provident. A careful review of the record compels affirmance.

I

W. Needham’s uncle was the founder and original owner of Communication Systems and Services Company (“CSSC”), an…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Frano v. Red Robin International, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Sammarco v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Beckloff v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Krukrubo v. Fifth Third Bank, 07ap-270 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API