Needham v. the Provident Bank
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harper, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, William J. Needham and Lucy M. Needham (“appellants,” collectively, or “W. Needham” and “L. Needham,” individually), appeal from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, The Provident Bank, by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. Appellants submit that genuine issues of material fact remain for litigation regarding their lender liability claims against Provident. A careful review of the record compels affirmance.
I
W. Needham’s uncle was the founder and original owner of Communication Systems and Services Company (“CSSC”), an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Frano v. Red Robin International, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sammarco v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Beckloff v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Krukrubo v. Fifth Third Bank, 07ap-270 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.