Legal Opinion
Light v. Ohio University
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1986No. 85-1889PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Whether the appellant is liable to the appellees herein depends upon our determination of the relationship of the parties and whether appellant breached the duty of care arising from that relationship.
We agree with the appellate court that Ohio’s recreational-user statutes are inapplicable in this case. R.C. 1533.18(B) reads:
“ ‘Recreational user’ means a person to whom permission has been granted, without the payment of a fee or consideration to the owner, lessee, or occupant of premises, other than a fee or consideration paid to the state or any agency thereof, to enter upon premises to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. AspellOhio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by184 opinions
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.