Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The case presents this court with the question of whether the doctrine of governmental immunity from tort liability for municipalities should be sustained in Ohio. With the limitations set forth in this opinion, this court overrules Dayton v. Pease (1854), 4 Ohio St. 80, wherein the sovereign immunity doctrine was extended to encompass local governmental units, and all other decisions which support this doctrine, and holds that immunity from tort liability heretofore judicially conferred upon *33local governmental units is hereby abrogated. Henceforth, so far as municipal governmental…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Laurie Range v. Kenneth DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.