Legal Opinion

Pepis v. Red Bank Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1935No. 21685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county rendered in favor of the defendant in error, as the defendant, and against the plaintiff in error, as the plaintiff. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff filed his amended petition, alleging that the defendant entered into a ■contract in writing on February 21, 1925, with F. J. Searight, whereby the defendant agreed to purchase from Searight an oil and gas lease covering the N.% of N.E.% of section 1, township 9 N., range 5 E., at an agreed price of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Boese v. ChildressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Snyder v. NossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Holland v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Carter v. Bond & BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Tulsa Herald v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API