Legal Opinion

Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. Funk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1925No. 15725PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff brings his action to recover $1,965.72, with interest from October 20, 1921, and alleges he entered into a contract, partly in writing, consisting of two separate instruments, and partly parol, whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase an automobile truck from defendant for the sum of $4,345.-10, and under the terms of the oral portion of the agreement, it was agreed that if the truck was left in the possession of the defendant, plaintiff might at any time he so desired, before payment in full of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Deming Investment Co. v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Stone v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. MerchantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Kelley v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API