Legal Opinion
Warren v. Pulley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 15, 1943No. 30394PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The questions for decision are whether the oral contract sued on is invalid under the parol evidence rule, and whether the question was properly raised in the trial court.
Plaintiff, Paul E. Pulley, sued defendant, J. H. Warren, to recover damages for the breach of an alleged oral contract of warranty guaranteeing the waterproof condition of the basement of a dwelling purchased by plaintiff from defendant. Judgment for plaintiff was entered on the verdict of a jury, and defendant appeals.
Plaintiff, in his petition, alleged that he had entered into a contract with defendant for the purchase of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Onstott v. OsborneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Mid-America Corporation v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.