Holland v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
For clarity and brevity the defendant in error and plaintiff in error will be referred to herein as “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively. The undisputed facts out of which the controversy between the two parties arose are substantially as hereinafter related.
In September, 1935, plaintiff, who is in the business of drilling and producing oil and gas wells, drilled a producing gas well upon a lot belonging to one Walter Ross, in the town of Foyil, Okla. After plaintiff had equipped the well for production, and on or about October 9, 1935, it was connected with the gas distributing system…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Burden v. SheridanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Lacy v. WozencraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Boese v. ChildressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fibikowski v. FibikowskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BusterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Britton v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Brown v. StufflebeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Wasson v. HaynieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.