Legal Opinion
Bloom v. American Express Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1946No. 34,225PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting his adversary’s motion to set aside the service of summons. His cause of action has for its object the recovery of overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 29 USCA, § 201, et seq. The services so rendered consisted of acting as defendant’s tour escort between Chicago and various cities and places in the Republic of Mexico between December 28, 1911, and June 1, 1912.
Defendant is an unincorporated joint-stock association organized under the common law of New York. It has conducted its business in Minnesota for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Askew v. Joachim Memorial HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.