Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1937No. 26435. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

— This action was commenced by plaintiffs to rescind an executory contract wherein they had agreed to purchase from defendants a farm situated in Franklin county. By way of answer, defendants denied the material allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint and sought affirmative relief by cross-complaint and counterclaim. In their reply, plaintiffs denied the allegations set out in defendants’ affirmative pleading.

Trial on the merits was had before the court, beginning September 4, 1934, and continuing, after some interruptions, through September 19, 1934.' Findings, conclusions and judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tremblay v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. Ferry CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. ParkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McCrabbe v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kelly v. St. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Potts v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Johnson v. Washington Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Malott v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Colasurdo v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Beagle v. BeagleWashington Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API