Legal Opinion

State v. Parkinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1935No. 25342. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Defendant was charged, in eight separate counts of an information, with the crime of grand larceny. Upon seven of the counts he was found guilty of the offense charged; upon the remaining count he was found guilty of petit larceny. From the judgment and sentence, defendant has appealed.

Eespondent has moved in this court that appellant’s statement of facts be stricken. The judgment of conviction was entered February 17, 1934. The statement of facts was served and filed June 6, 1934.

A period of one hundred and nine days elapsed between these two dates. Under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 308-7 [P. C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. WinslowMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. State v. VandenburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Palotta v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. HarderWashington Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MercyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hunter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Schultz v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API