Legal Opinion

McCrabbe v. Jones

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1933No. 24081. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover upon two promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage which secured the payment of the same. The defendants admitted the execution of the notes, and counterclaimed for damages for a breach of a written contract signed at the same time the notes and mortgage were executed. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment for the amount of. the two notes, $1,550, with interest thereon, and from this should be deducted the sum of $886.10,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle National Bank v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Carr v. Zellerbach Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Russell v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Picco v. RoneyWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hunter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pattison v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Nudd v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Schultz v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API