Legal Opinion

Kelly v. St. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1936No. 25768. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff, Aurelia Kelly, brought this action against defendant, May St. Martin, to recover an alleged overpayment of profits derived from the operation of a mineral springs property owned jointly by plaintiff and defendant together with several other persons. Defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint, and, by way of counterclaim, sought recovery upon a judgment rendered in her favor against plaintiff in a former action. Upon a trial before the court, judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, but allowing plaintiff a credit upon defendant’s former judgment. Each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Seattle National Bank v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Puget Sound Bulb Exchange v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re the Estate of St. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schultz v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McGregor v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Remlinger v. the Grange StoreWashington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API