Edmark Motors, Inc. v. Twin Cities Toyota, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
This appeal presents issues of materiality, proximate cause and punitive damages in an action for fraud. Edmark Motors sued Twin Cities Toyota and its sales manager, Harold Myers, alleging that they had defrauded Edmark in a used car transaction. A jury agreed. Judgment was entered upon a verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages. Today we affirm the judgment.
At the heart of this case is a 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. Twin Cities purchased the El Camino from a dealership which had acquired it from an auto auction. For several months Twin Cities carried the El Camino in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Faw v. GreenwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Garnett v. Transamerica Insurance ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Magic Valley Radiology Associates v. Professional Business Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Fussell v. St. ClairIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.