Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Transamerica Insurance Services

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1990No. 17740PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a fire insurance case. The issues presented are:

1. Was the trial court correct in allowing the jury to decide whether the insureds (the Garnetts) were entitled to payments from the insurance company (Transamerica) for repair or replacement of the damaged property before the Garnetts completed the reconstruction and documented the cost?

We hold that the trial court properly allowed the jury to decide this question.

2. Was the trial court correct in allowing the jury to decide whether the Garnetts were entitled to payments from Transamerica for improvements to the damaged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API