Cox v. Stolworthy
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
Plaintiffs-respondents Clinton Cox and Roger D. Cox, father and son, instituted this action against defendant-appellant Lloyd Stolworthy, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for trespass upon premises held by the Coxes under a lease from the State of Idaho. In their complaint the plaintiffs alleged wilful and malicious trespass by the defendant in bulldozing about half a mile of road through the premises and in destruction of a fence; they also alleged wilful and malicious trespass by the defendant or his agents in running sheep over the plaintiffs’ property. By his…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Giant of Virginia, Inc. v. PiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Fortino v. Quasar Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.