Legal Opinion

G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1991No. 18136PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this appeal from entry of a partial summary judgment, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court correctly ruled that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case on the claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation.

*516The plaintiff-appellant, G & M Farms, is the purchaser of an agriculture irrigation system manufactured by the defendant-respondent Lindsay Manufacturing Company and distributed by Lindsay’s co-defendant-respondent, Funk Irrigation. According to the record, G & M Farms began negotiating in the summer of 1984 with Funk Irrigation and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sanders v. Kuna Joint School DistrictIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API