Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1983No. 14003PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action arising from an oral contract for the care and feeding of a herd of cattle. Appellants assert error in evidentiary rulings, jury instructions and the assessment of punitive damages. We affirm.

Defendants-appellants Florance and Palos Verdes Investment Corporation owned a cattle ranch in Nevada doing business as Bell Brand Ranches, Inc. In April 1979, the ranch manager Segull, because of an insufficiency of hay, contacted plaintiffs-respondents Cheney, seeking to place approximately 800 head of cattle on the Cheneys’ feedlot in…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fortino v. Quasar Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API