Legal Opinion

Faw v. Greenwood

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1980No. 13129PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Plaintiff appellants Thomas and Lois Faw brought suit against defendant respondents Bill and Sylvia Greenwood for fraud and misrepresentation, seeking damages and rescission of a contract for the sale of the Greenwoods’ business. The Greenwoods counterclaimed for breach of contract, seeking proceeds allegedly due from a consignment sales agreement. The district court, sitting without a jury, rejected the Faws’ claim and held for the Greenwoods on their counterclaim. We affirm.

The Greenwoods commenced doing business in November of 1974. The business consisted of retail sales,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Smith v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Umphrey v. SprinkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Watson v. WeickIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API