Allen v. Bd. of Trs. of Bakersfield
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Trustees of the City of Bakersfield. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The petitioner, a resident, elector, and taxpayer of the city of Bakersfield, applied for and obtained from this court an alternative writ of mandate requiring the trustees, in calling an election for the election of officers for a consolidated city composed of said city of Bakersfield and the town of Kern, to call the election of the board of trustees of such consolidated city at large and not from wards, and also to embrace in their call a board of education. The facts alleged in the petition are, for the purposes of this hearing, admitted, the respondents relying solely upon a demurrer.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Board of Education v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bay View School District v. LinscottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kramm v. BogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Riedman v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- People Ex Rel. Strong v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Ackerman v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918