Legal Opinion

Bay View School District v. Linscott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1893No. 15199PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate upon an agreed case. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

In August, 1865, there were in Santa Cruz County two adjacent school districts, one known as the Santa Cruz school district and the other as the Bay View school district. Since that time both have maintained their autonomy, electing trustees at the proper times, and have kept up schools within the original boundaries of their respective districts.

The Bay View district, the plaintiff here, in 1868 purchased a lot for its school-house and has since expended five thousand dollars in building a school-house upon it. In this house its school has been since maintained where there has been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crick v. RashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Hamilton v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kramm v. BogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API