Legal Opinion
Riedman v. Brison
California Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13832PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
An initiative petition, purporting to be signed by 7,253 duly qualified electors of the city of Long Beach, was presented to the city council of that municipality, submitting for adoption an ordinance directing the council to call an election on some future date not definitely fixed, at which there should be submitted to the voters the question whether or not the city of Long Beach should withdraw from membership in the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, of which the city now forms a part. Before the city clerk had examined the petition for the purpose of ascertaining whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Building Industry Assn. of Southern California, Inc. v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.