Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Strong v. City of Whittier
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1933No. Docket No. 8613PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in quo warranto, declaring invalid an attempted annexation of certain territory in the City of Whittier, Los Angeles County.
There are three separate acts prescribing the procedure for the annexation of territory to an existing city. These acts are the same basically. The act of 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 358) provides for annexation of inhabited territory upon petition of electors of an existing city. The act of 1899 (Stats. 1899, p. 37) provides for the annexation of uninhabited territory to an existing city. The act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 587) provides for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Central Manufacturing District, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.