Welborn v. Bate Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Title to real property is not at issue in this action. Plaintiffs and defendant admit the parties own the respective tracts claimed by them. The two tracts are contiguous and the northern boundary of the drainage district is the true dividing line. The exact location of this line is the question at issue. Realizing this, the parties entered into certain stipulations quoted in the statement of fact. These stipulations converted the trial in the court below into a processioning proceeding. Goodwin v. Greene, 237 N.C. 244. Thereafter, the action was not subject to dismissal as in ease of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Huffman v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Goodwin v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blair v. FairchildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Combs v. WoodieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Prince v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Bumgarner v. CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Napoli v. PhilbrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.