Legal Opinion

Bumgarner v. Corpening

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1957No. 314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The court charged the jury: “Ordinarily, gentlemen, we have somebody that has an older title and somebody that has been in possession of the land in dispute. In this case, gentlemen, they both go back to a common source of title. They both claim from one of the great-grandfathers, Bumgarner, so neither has an older title than the other, and neither has exercised any possession of it up until the last three or four years and it takes at least seven years to acquire title by possession . . .”

Defendants excepted to the quoted portion of the charge, insisting that the court had misconstrued the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Berry v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Newkirk v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Pruden v. KeemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Cobb v. SpurlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API