Prince v. Prince
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeocK, J.
Appellants’ sole assignment of error is to the signing and entry of the judgment. Such an assignment of error presents the face of the record for review, and review is limited to the question of whether error of law appears on the face of the record, which includes whether the facts found, or admitted, support the conclusions of law and the judgment. But, such an assignment of error does not present for review the findings of fact or the sufficiency of the evidence to support them. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152.
Appellants argue that the findings of fact do not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Welborn v. Bate Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Coley v. MORRIS TELEPHONE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jarman v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Savage v. SavageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Lamb v. McKibbonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Reeves v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- County of Currituck v. UptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973