Cornelison v. . Hammond
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
When, in a processioning proceeding under G. S., ch. 38, it is made to appear that there is a bona fide dispute between the owners as to the true location of the boundary line between adjoining tracts of land, may the cause be dismissed as in case of nonsuit? The answer is no.
The proceeding authorized by G. S., ch. 38, is an in rem proceeding. The petitioner is required to make thé adjoining landowner party defendant and to allege only “facts sufficient to constitute the location” of the disputed line as claimed by him. If the respondent fails to answer, “judgment shall be given establishing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Huffman v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- McCanless v. . BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Boone v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Combs v. WoodieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.