Legal Opinion

Plemmons v. Cutshall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHIll, J.

The appellees here assert that the case was improperly transferred to the civil issue docket and by reason thereof the judgment should be sustained for want of jurisdiction. This position is untenable.

The clerk is but a part of the Superior Court. Williams v. Dunn, 158 N.C. 399, 74 S.E. 99; Bynum v. Bank, 219 N.C. 109, 12 S.E. 2d 898. "Whenever a special proceeding begun before him is, for any ground whatever, sent to the Superior Court before the judge, the judge has jurisdiction. G.S. 1-276; McDaniel v. Leggett, 224 N.C. 806, 32 S.E. 2d 602, and cases cited. This rule applies to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Williams v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Moore v. . MassengillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Jones v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bailey v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Woody v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Langley v. LangleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Welborn v. Bate Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API