Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Greene

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1953No. 23PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

Since the plaintiff and the defendants are contiguous landowners, and having stipulated that the controversy between them is bottomed on a dispute as to the location of the true dividing line between their adjoining tracts of land, the action in so far as it relates to the location of such line is in effect a processioning proceeding. Clegg v. Canady, 217 N.C. 433, 8 S.E. 2d 246; Cody v. England, 216 N.C. 604, 5 S.E. 2d 833.

The defendants except to the following portions of his Honor’s charge: (1) “The defendants in their allegations, in their answer, admit that the plaintiff is the owner of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Cover.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Euliss v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Den Ex Dem. Sasser v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
  4. Den. on Dem. of Corn v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  5. Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blair v. FairchildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Coffey v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Welborn v. Bate Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Coffey v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Harris v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API