Legal Opinion

Lake v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 14, 1981No. 81 C 0533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff, Queen Lake (“Lake”), brought this action on behalf of her daughter, Tinesha Lake (“Tinesha”), a minor, against defendants United States of America (“United States”), United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), Paul E. Knoppel (“Knoppel”), the Acting Chief Property Officer for HUD, Hobbs & Grubbs, Inc., a corporation, General Realty & Building Company, a corporation, Robert Boose, Mode Boose, and Lois Preston (“Preston”). Lake seeks damages against the defendants for injuries sustained by Tinesha while playing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Terry Tindle v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Scheible v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Brooks ex rel. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API