Lake v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Queen Lake (“Lake”), brought this action on behalf of her daughter, Tinesha Lake (“Tinesha”), a minor, against defendants United States of America (“United States”), United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), Paul E. Knoppel (“Knoppel”), the Acting Chief Property Officer for HUD, Hobbs & Grubbs, Inc., a corporation, General Realty & Building Company, a corporation, Robert Boose, Mode Boose, and Lois Preston (“Preston”). Lake seeks damages against the defendants for injuries sustained by Tinesha while playing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- Terry Tindle v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Scheible v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Brooks ex rel. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.