Legal Opinion

Scheible v. Jackson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2008No. 03A01-0704-CV-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Plaintiff Christine R. Scheible (“Scheible”) appeals the trial court’s grant of Appellee-Defendant Fred Jackson’s (“Jackson”) Motion for Summary Judgment.1 We reverse and remand.

*1053Issue

Seheible raises the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in granting Jackson’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts recited throughout this opinion are those alleged by and most favorable to Seheible, the non-movant. Jackson and his wife Dorothy Jackson (“Dorothy”) owned two parcels on the north side of 7th Street in Columbus, Indiana…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Minaya v. Massachusetts Credit Union Share Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Blake v. Dunn Farms, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Henthorne v. Legacy Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Farragher v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. ScheibleIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jackson v. ScheibleIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Scheible v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API