Legal Opinion
Brooks ex rel. Brooks v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 21, 1989No. 88 C 1967Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint, and the federal defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. For the following reasons, *669the motion to amend the complaint is granted, the motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, the federal defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and defendant Moses Dosu is dismissed without prejudice. As a result of these rulings, the court need not rule on plaintiffs' subsequently filed Motion for Summary Judgment on the counterclaim.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Century Display Manufacturing Corp. v. D. R. Wager Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.