Ray B. Woodbury v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Woodbury’s appeal comes before us upon a judgment of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, made final pursuant to Rule 54(b) F.R.Civ.P. There is a counterclaim pending. Both parties accept the trial court’s findings as to the facts, embodied in a written opinion, and we take our statement from that opinion.
Woodbury claims the right to recover' •$853,676.82 from the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671-2680). He was interested in constructing prefabricated housing for naval and civilian personnel stationed at the Kodiak Naval Base…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Fort Vancouver Plywood Co., a Washington Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Michael R. Wood v. The United States, U.S. Customs Service, Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Albrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.