Legal Opinion
Soule v. Soule
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1906No. Civ. No. 143PublishedCited by 58 opinions
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County, modifying a decree for permanent alimony. H. A. Melvin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
A decree of divorce between the parties herein was rendered by the superior court of the county of Alameda December 19, 1896, of which the following is a portion:
“It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by this eourt that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of seventy-five dollars per month in United States gold coin for her support, which said sum of seventy-five dollars shall be payable on the fifth day of each and every month and shall be permanent alimony.”
In August, 1903, the defendant therein, in pursuance of previous notice thereof, moved the court for an order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lamborn v. LambornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.