O'Brien v. O'Brien
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco amending a judgment nunc pro tunc. D. J. Murphy, Judge rendering judgment. A. A. Sanderson, Judge awarding alimony. Edward A. Belcher, Judge ordering amendment of judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Proceedings to amend a decree of divorce by motion. The trial of the action was concluded on July 8, 1895, and on that day the then trial judge, Hon. D. J. Murphy, signed, and there was filed by the clerk a paper entitled “memorandum of decision.” It is a brief statement of three paragraphs, prefaced p follows: “In this case, after fully considering the evidence, I am led to the following conclusions, and find the facts to he.” Paragraph I is a statement that the evidence is not sufficient to support the claim that the parties intermar*424ried in 1890, or were husband and wife prior to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.