Legal Opinion
Groth v. Sandoz, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided December 26, 1984No. CV. 83-0-694PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 16). On October 30, 1984, a hearing was conducted on such motion at which oral argument was presented by the respective parties. After review of the pleadings, briefs and other documents filed in support of and in opposition to said motion, the Court concludes that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is well taken and should be granted.
The facts are these. In January 1971, plaintiff began taking Fiorinal, a pharmaceutical manufactured and distributed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- MacMillen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Morris v. Chrysler Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Almarez v. HartmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Spilker v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Peterson v. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- BNSF Railway Co. v. L.B. Foster Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.